Calibration of an Unstable Circuit Model using Prediction Error Method
In this example, we present the creation of a custom component is demonstrated via the Chua's circuit. The circuit is a simple circuit that shows chaotic behaviour. Except for a non-linear resistor every other component already is part of ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary.Electrical
. We can then seamlessly plug this model with JuliaSimModelOptimizer for calibration.
Julia environment
For this example, we will need the following packages:
Module | Description |
---|---|
JuliaSimModelOptimizer | The high-level library used to formulate our problem and perform automated model discovery |
ModelingToolkit | The symbolic modeling environment |
ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary | Library for using standard modeling components |
OrdinaryDiffEq | The numerical differential equation solvers |
DataFrames | For converting simulation into a Dataframe |
Plots | The plotting and visualization library |
using JuliaSimModelOptimizer
using ModelingToolkit
import ModelingToolkit: D_nounits as D, t_nounits as t
using ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary.Electrical
using ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary.Electrical: OnePort
using OrdinaryDiffEq
using DataFrames
using Plots
Model Setup
The first step is to use the pre defined components defined in the Electrical Toolkit in the ModelingToolkit library. We can also define custom components such as the "Non linear resistor" as defined below. One advantage of using ModelingToolkit is being directly able to use custom components out of the box. We can define a Resistor component, a Capacitor component, an Inductor component etc. ModelingToolkit defined models can be seamlessly integrated with the solvers from DifferentialEquations.jl.
function NonlinearResistor(; name, Ga, Gb, Ve)
@named oneport = OnePort()
@unpack v, i = oneport
pars = @parameters Ga=Ga Gb=Gb Ve=Ve
eqs = [
i ~ ifelse(v < -Ve,
Gb * (v + Ve) - Ga * Ve,
ifelse(v > Ve,
Gb * (v - Ve) + Ga * Ve,
Ga * v)),
]
extend(ODESystem(eqs, t, [], pars; name = name), oneport)
end
@named L = Inductor(L = 18)
@named Ro = Resistor(R = 12.5e-3)
@named G = Conductor(G = 0.565)
@named C1 = Capacitor(C = 10, v = 4)
@named C2 = Capacitor(C = 100)
@named Nr = NonlinearResistor(Ga = -0.757576, Gb = -0.409091, Ve = 1)
@named Gnd = Ground()
connections = [connect(L.p, G.p)
connect(G.n, Nr.p)
connect(Nr.n, Gnd.g)
connect(C1.p, G.n)
connect(L.n, Ro.p)
connect(G.p, C2.p)
connect(C1.n, Gnd.g)
connect(C2.n, Gnd.g)
connect(Ro.n, Gnd.g)]
@named model = ODESystem(connections, t, systems = [L, Ro, G, C1, C2, Nr, Gnd])
sys = structural_simplify(model)
\[ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d} L_{+}i\left( t \right)}{\mathrm{d}t} =& \frac{L_{+}v\left( t \right)}{L_{+}L} \\ \frac{\mathrm{d} C1_{+}v\left( t \right)}{\mathrm{d}t} =& \frac{C1_{+}i\left( t \right)}{C1_{+}C} \\ \frac{\mathrm{d} C2_{+}v\left( t \right)}{\mathrm{d}t} =& \frac{C2_{+}i\left( t \right)}{C2_{+}C} \end{align} \]
Data Setup
Let us simulate using a stiff ODE solver Rodas4
and use this data for calibration.
@unpack L, C2 = model
prob = ODEProblem(sys, [L.i => 0.0, C2.v => 0.0], (0, 5e4), [Ro.R => 11e-3, C1.C => 9.3, C2.C => 102.5], saveat = 10)
sol = solve(prob, Rodas4())
data = DataFrame(sol)
first(data, 5)
Row | timestamp | L₊i | C1₊v | C2₊v |
---|---|---|---|---|
Float64 | Float64 | Float64 | Float64 | |
1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 |
2 | 10.0 | 0.0584802 | 3.78822 | 0.206174 |
3 | 20.0 | 0.222747 | 3.7161 | 0.383145 |
4 | 30.0 | 0.475659 | 3.74541 | 0.529685 |
5 | 40.0 | 0.799431 | 3.84308 | 0.644382 |
Defining Experiment and InverseProblem
This system is unstable and it can be difficult to simulate it for different sets of parameters. To mitigate this, we will use Prediction Error Method, where the simulation is guided by the data such that the trajectory won't diverge and this should help with the calibration process.
In order to create an Experiment
, we will use the default initial values of the states and parameters of our model. These are our initial guesses which will be used to optimize the inverse problem in order to fit the given data. To use Prediction Error Method, we also need to pass it in the model_transformations
keyword in the constructor.
experiment = Experiment(data, sys, initial_conditions = [L.i => 0.0, C2.v => 0.0], model_transformations = [DiscreteFixedGainPEM(0.2)], alg = Rodas4())
Experiment for model with no fixed parameters or initial conditions.
The simulation of this experiment is given by:
ODEProblem with uType Vector{Float64} and tType Float64. In-place: true
timespan: (0.0, 50000.0)
Argument passed to DiscreteFixedGainPEM
is the amount of correction needed during simulation. 1.0
represents completely using the data and 0.0
represents completely ignoring the data. Typically, we should use this be about 0.2-0.3 to help guide the simulation.
The next step is to define an InverseProblem
by specifying the parameters we want to optimize and the search space of those parameters.
prob = InverseProblem(experiment, [Ro.R => (9.5e-3, 13.5e-3), C1.C => (9, 11), C2.C => (95, 105)])
InverseProblem with one experiment with 3 elements in the search space.
Calibration
We will use SingleShooting
as our calibration algorithm. To calibrate, we simply call calibrate
with our inverse problem and calibration algorithm.
alg = SingleShooting(maxiters = 10^3)
r = calibrate(prob, alg)
Calibration result computed in 1 minute and 27 seconds. Final objective value: 0.00675041.
Optimization ended with Success Return Code and returned.
┌──────────┬─────────┬─────────┐
│ Ro₊R │ C1₊C │ C2₊C │
├──────────┼─────────┼─────────┤
│ 0.010999 │ 9.29164 │ 102.568 │
└──────────┴─────────┴─────────┘
As we see above, the parameters recovered match the true parameters!
Visualization
We can now plot the simulation using the calibrated parameters and compare it against the data.
plot(experiment, prob, r, show_data = true, legend = :best, ms = 0.2, layout = (3, 1), size = (1000, 900))